Talk:Point-Counterpoint

Needs more citations, please add relevant ones ASAP SKS45 (talk) 17:10, 27 October 2014 (EDT)

Unencyclopedic
This is a blog post, not an encyclopedic entry. It bothers me. I don't think it belongs. Psycho Robot (talk) 15:56, 3 November 2014 (EST)
 * Attempting to clean up this article, but this would be better suited as an independent blog page. Honestly, the only reason it seems to be on the wiki is because you can link to specfic sections of the page SKS45 (talk) 05:01, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Dumping of things that may be of interest
http://i.imgur.com/FNcIPGI.png

- CrazedMan (talk) 06:41, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

http://smashedpatriarchy.tumblr.com/post/110976450464/the-female-character-in-the-svu-episode-tonight

- CrazedMan (talk) 11:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Purpose
You're right, Psycho.

This isn't an article. It's a blog post.

I, however, believe that this can be rectified. Lend me your ears, if you will.

As you may recall, Wikipedia is currently hosting an article entitled 'Gamergate controversy'. As you may also recall, said article happens to be up its proverbial nipples in spinach-green bullshit. Seeing as how we are presently incapable of directly rectifying this affront, I propose that we instead utilize this article as a kind of public rebuttal. Beyond simply cataloguing the ethical misconduct of the various admins, officials, and editors, involved, we must also counter the points made in the article. We must draw attention to the dubious nature of the article's sources, and we must also categorically deconstruct each and every own of the various misconceptions, fallacies, duplicities, and inaccuracies that it disseminates. In order to avoid any accusations of 'canvassing' by the denizens of Wikipedia, we would have to avoid discussing in all but the most didactic of contexts. Seeing as how we are not under the hegemony of an imbecilic retinue of draconian admins, we would be free to discuss the shortcomings of the article to our heart's content--provided that we avoid the aforementioned 'canvassing'.

I invite your input--and anyone else's, for that matter. Berke Stavoy (talk) 01:25, 1 March 2015 (UTC)