Talk:Fark

Untitled
I'm not sure if this page is needed. The bulk of the info is non-GG related, and even quite outdated (i.e. Fark hasn't had "boobies" links in years). Think this should be purged. Thoughts? -ac4l
 * I'm of the same opinion. I don't believe we should have an article for each and every publication who endorsed Depression Quest. We should maybe link them all somewhere, but each and every article? Nope. Also, don't forget to type "~ to type your name, link to talk page, and date. Awesomedove (talk) 19:18, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I am of an inclusionist mindset and think is better to keep tangential information rather than to purge it. - That being said, the introduction of the article is terribly unencylopaedic and needlessly opinion-based. If we can find a good source that describes Fark as a "boy's club", we can link and properly cite it. Until then it should be limited to facts. --JTRetrogamer (talk) 19:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * But pretty much all of it is quite trivial and unrelated to GamerGate. I count exactly 1 sentence relating to Gamergate in the entire article. It should just be merged with some other article, maybe the Depression Quest article. Awesomedove (talk) 23:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)