Talk:The David Pakman Show

>Opinions

I feel that I should note that David is using an logical fallacy on his stance of GG. The fallacy of relative privation, or appeal to worse problems, is an informal fallacy which attempts to suggest that the opponent's argument should be ignored because there are more important problems in the world, despite the fact that these issues are often completely unrelated to the subject under discussion. A well-known example of this fallacy is the response "but there are children starving in Africa," with the implication that any issue less serious than that is not worthy of discussion.

I still respect him for trying to remain unbiased throughout this process without feelings getting in the way of the issues and for giving fair and balanced interviews for everyone involved. --Gastort (talk) 21:20, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * You're right, but I think he's more talking about why he's not concerned about GamerGate. He's not calling us bad people for not thinking of the poor african children, is he? He just says personally he's more worried about them. Psycho Robot (talk) 21:53, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * True there. I also copy\pasted the Wikipedia article verbatim.  It would be nice to have someone like him in our corner, but I know he still has a job to do with talking about other political topics for his show.--Gastort (talk) 05:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Agreed. That's why I added the argument on Point-Counterpoint. Not sure whether or not it should be brought onto this page when I eventually get around to added how he was accused of harassing women by MSNBC.--Chanchan (talk) 01:45, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Dump of stuff
finding related to David Pakman Show

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfmssM5Vb6o#t=103

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcekWwf4i-0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kC7s7tfaEc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_782j_Cev8

- CrazedMan (talk) 02:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)